Skip to main content

Burger King's Impossible Whopper

 I'll open by saying that if you're expecting a gourmet burger, you're probably not looking at Burger King.  There are 1,000 other places (precisely one thousand, I counted myself) to get a higher-quality burger.  But, when you require food that is fast, cheap, and easy (you are what you eat, am I right?!?!?!) there are a myriad of options for drive-through, franchised, processed, scientifically-engineered-to-taste-good food.  Miss me with your "fast food is trash" snobbery; this review isn't for you.  See the pizza and burger reviews for quality food.

There's something about the plant-based Impossible patty that enhances all the flavors around it - the smokey char of Burger King's "flame broiled" fame sticks around more than the normal beef Whopper.  The toppings don't blend with the patty flavor either, so you can distinctly pick up the flavors of the tomatoes, onions, lettuce, pickles, and mayonnaise.  Only the bun seemed to fade into the background.  Because of this, there's a bit of olfactory overwhelm when you first open the wrapper.

The texture is a wee bit more crumbly than a comparable beef patty, but it simply felt like it was overcooked, moreso than anything else.  

A few hours later, I'm left feeling like I'd eaten a rice-heavy dish like a burrito or something...a little more than full, but not quite I've Eaten So Much That I Hate Myself Now status.  I've noticed a trend over the past 8-9 months, especially as I've been on the road for my big kid job, that eating the normal beef options at Burger King leave me feeling "icky."  A little bloated, a little greasy, a little clammy.  This is not the case with the Impossible Whopper, so that's quite refreshing.

Overall, I gotta say that the Impossible Whopper felt like I was eating the Whopper that I remember from the late 90's and early 2000's - before fast food in general emphasized health or quality; before Burger King leaned hard into the ridiculous and the "epic burgers" of it all.  If you handed me an Impossible Whopper and said that it was cooked on the lost art of Burger King circa Y2K, I'd believe you.

Would I order the Impossible Whopper again?

Let me counter that question with another question:  Is it worth the 80 cent upcharge over the normal Whopper?

I think 80 cents is a little steep.  The combo still comes in at the same price as a McDonald's Quarter Pounder With Cheese (meaning the normal Beef Whopper is actually cheaper than a QPC).

I would definitely order the Impossible Whopper again...that's a pretty hard yes.  But, the cost is what has me concerned.  Given the choice between paying 80 cents, or not paying 80 cents, the option is clear.  If it were the exact same cost as a Beef Whopper and the Impossible Patty were just another option in "Having It Your Way," I'd go Impossible every time.  It's just really, really hard to justify a 10% cost increase for a burger that's so damn similar to the original.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Cedar Swamp Village

Holland has only been a settled city for a little over 170 years. But, it's got a dense, unique history. I took an interest in local history during my college years at Northern Michigan University, and was able to take that interest back home after graduation. Recently, I began researching for this blog, and hanging out at the library, poring through the Local History section. I found an old, forboding looking book, entitled Memorials Of The Grand River Valley, flipped open to a seemingly random page, and read the passage "The Indian village, near the southeastern limits of the city,w as also a prominent landing-place. The log-houses, built by the Indians, were of great service to the newly arrived immigrants; and, as it appears, there never has been any trouble between the Red man and the Dutchman." This piqued my interest, as I live near the southeastern limits of Holland. Was there an Indian village in my own neighborhood that history forgot? Memorials ad...

Merry Christmas from Tulip City!

I don't have a full article this week, but here's a little bit of trivia for you: While Holland is a predominantly Christian Reformed city, it was the early Methodists that sprung the Christmas spirit. While an 1867 Sunday School Christmas Program drew nearly 150 youngsters to Hope Church, it was several generations before the Reformed church allowed even Christmas trees into their sanctuaries, as Christmas trees were seen as Pagan symbols. Early Methodists adopted the 19th Century American spirit, and welcomed things like Christmas trees and even Santa Claus into their sanctuaries. I tried to determine exactly how long "several generations" were using Dr. Swierenga's book (and the sources he cites), but could not ascertain the exact time. It's almost certainly somewhere in the vicinity of 50 years (before the Christian Reformed Churches allowed 'pagan' Christmas symbols), which would put their allowing of such things into the early 20th century, but ...

A Rebuttal To *Robert Evans: The Joe Rogan Of The American Left*

 User TheOriginalBigDave on Reddit recently wrote the following scathing review of Robert Evans and his content material , instead calling Robert Evans "The Ben Shapiro Of The American Left:" Yeah, you heard me. I know this is the most unpopular thing to post, but it's been bouncing around in my head for a while, and I couldn't think of another place to say it. Know what the difference is between Robert Evans and Ben Shaprio? Ben Shaprio probably makes less money then Robert Evans. Otherwise, they're the exact same. Shapiro says don't trust the media because its controlled by the democrats, Evans says don't trust the media because they manufacture consent. Both of them do the whole contrarian 'Im just saying' bullshit, both of them indirectly encourage streetfighting and buying firearms for 'self-defence', both of them actively want a second American Civil War, and both of them have come real close to advocating for the assassinat...