Skip to main content

Junk Food Review: Chocolatey Payday.

 I saw an ad on my Instagram page for a chocolate-covered Payday bar.  Jokingly, I took a screenshot, and posted it on my stories asking the question "Isn't this just a Baby Ruth?"  A friend responded by saying that no, a Baby Ruth is peanuts surrounding caramel and chocolate-flavored nougat; the chocolate-covered Payday is peanuts in caramel-flavored nougat, dipped in chocolate.

Now, candy bars are made from a few common ingredients:  Chocolate, peanuts, nougat, and caramel.  Chocolate and nougat is something like a 3 Musketeers.  Chocolate, nougat, and caramel is something like a Milky Way.  All 4 makes a Snickers bar.  Chocolate and Peanuts is a Mr. Goodbar.  Chocolate and caramel is either a Caramello or a type of Milky Way.  Peanuts and caramel (no chocolate) is a Payday.  And, chocolate, peanuts, and caramel led to the confusion that took me down the road to writing this article in the first place.


I did what any sane person would do:  I bought both bars, and did a head-to-head taste test:

From the label, a Baby Ruth contains the following ingredients:
Sugar, Roasted Peanuts, Corn Syrup, Partially Hydrogenated Palm Kernel, Coconut, and Soybean Oils, Milk, Cocoa, High Fructose Syrup, Dextrose, Skim Milk, Whey, Glycerin, Salt, Emulsifiers (Monoglycerides and Soy Lecithin), Peanut Oil, Natural and Artificial Flavors, Carrageenan, Tbhq and Citric Acid (to Preserve Freshness), Caramel Color.

A chocolate Payday contains:
Sugar, Peanuts, Vegetable Oil, Corn Syrup, Chocolate, Skim Milk, Whey, Salt, Lecithin, Carrageenan, Mono and Diglycerides, and Vannilin.

The Chocolatey Payday has a shorter ingredient list, but it doesn't parse out the oils like Baby Ruth does.  On the Hershey website, the ingredients for the Chocolatey Payday lists "vegetable oil," then breaks it down into a very similar list to Baby Ruth.

 
Pictured above, left is the Baby Ruth and right is the Chocolatey Payday.  The size difference is for a silly reason:  I could only find a King Size Chocolatey Payday, and didn't want to bother finding a King Size Baby Ruth.  Right off the bat, though, we see the similarities:  A caramelly core, surrounded by peanuts and chocolate in each bar., with no visible layers of nougat like you'd see in a Snickers or Milky Way.  But, the peanuts are contained directly on top of the caramelly core on the Baby Ruth, whereas they sit around the outside of the Chocolatey Payday.  Despite the caramel core being approximately the same size, the Payday appears larger because it has peanuts on the outside edges.  The caramel on the Chocolatey Payday appears shinier, but it was also partially melted because it was in my shirt pocket.  The Baby Ruth stayed relatively cool in the car on the drive home.  I don't necessarily think that the sheen is an indicator of chocolate quality...I mean, I picked these up from a gas station, for cryin' out loud.  They're not from a boutique chocolatier or anything.

The Baby Ruth wrapper boasted "Improved with dry roasted peanuts," which is also emphasized in the ingredients list.  From this, we can only ascertain that the Payday uses regular ol' greasy-ass peanuts like Uncle Ed eats at deer camp.  That is, of course, until we turn to hershey.com and navigate to the Payday section where it's spelled out that Payday also uses dry-roasted, salted peanuts.  They just don't talk about it on the wrapper.  I'll be honest though, to my palate, they taste the same.  I won't go so far as to say they're the same damn candy bar, but they're basically the same list of ingredients presented in a nearly identical manner.

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Cedar Swamp Village

Holland has only been a settled city for a little over 170 years. But, it's got a dense, unique history. I took an interest in local history during my college years at Northern Michigan University, and was able to take that interest back home after graduation. Recently, I began researching for this blog, and hanging out at the library, poring through the Local History section. I found an old, forboding looking book, entitled Memorials Of The Grand River Valley, flipped open to a seemingly random page, and read the passage "The Indian village, near the southeastern limits of the city,w as also a prominent landing-place. The log-houses, built by the Indians, were of great service to the newly arrived immigrants; and, as it appears, there never has been any trouble between the Red man and the Dutchman." This piqued my interest, as I live near the southeastern limits of Holland. Was there an Indian village in my own neighborhood that history forgot? Memorials ad...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Rebuttal To *Robert Evans: The Joe Rogan Of The American Left*

 User TheOriginalBigDave on Reddit recently wrote the following scathing review of Robert Evans and his content material , instead calling Robert Evans "The Ben Shapiro Of The American Left:" Yeah, you heard me. I know this is the most unpopular thing to post, but it's been bouncing around in my head for a while, and I couldn't think of another place to say it. Know what the difference is between Robert Evans and Ben Shaprio? Ben Shaprio probably makes less money then Robert Evans. Otherwise, they're the exact same. Shapiro says don't trust the media because its controlled by the democrats, Evans says don't trust the media because they manufacture consent. Both of them do the whole contrarian 'Im just saying' bullshit, both of them indirectly encourage streetfighting and buying firearms for 'self-defence', both of them actively want a second American Civil War, and both of them have come real close to advocating for the assassinat...
Post a Comment
Read more

Merry Christmas from Tulip City!

I don't have a full article this week, but here's a little bit of trivia for you: While Holland is a predominantly Christian Reformed city, it was the early Methodists that sprung the Christmas spirit. While an 1867 Sunday School Christmas Program drew nearly 150 youngsters to Hope Church, it was several generations before the Reformed church allowed even Christmas trees into their sanctuaries, as Christmas trees were seen as Pagan symbols. Early Methodists adopted the 19th Century American spirit, and welcomed things like Christmas trees and even Santa Claus into their sanctuaries. I tried to determine exactly how long "several generations" were using Dr. Swierenga's book (and the sources he cites), but could not ascertain the exact time. It's almost certainly somewhere in the vicinity of 50 years (before the Christian Reformed Churches allowed 'pagan' Christmas symbols), which would put their allowing of such things into the early 20th century, but ...
Post a Comment
Read more